Describes socioeconomic and cultural background in complete detail with references; identified 3 or more psychosocial concerns.

Published by

Nov 18, 2022

s

Struggling with a similar assignment? Don’t know where to start? Don’t have time to work on this? Get a high-quality paper written for you from scratch – PLAGIARISM FREE, guaranteed to get you a good grade. To get started, please click on the Submit Your Instructions at the bottom of the page.

NURS 121L-A Clinical Judgment Plan
NURS 121L-A Clinical Judgment Plan
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment & History of Present Illness
Recognizing cues focused on observation
3 pts
Proficient
HPI explains in detail with accurate and in- depth understanding of chief complaint and supported by evidence-based citations.
2.28 pts
Acceptable
HPI explains in some detail with moderate understanding of chief complaint or no support from evidence-based citations.
1.8 pts
Needs Improvement
HPI explains in limited detail with insufficient understanding of chief complaint or support from evidence-based citations.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
HPI details limited with poor understanding of chief complaint and no evidence-based citations to support.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognizing assessment parameters
Clinical thinking and assessment cues
7 pts
Proficient
Identifies the 4 imperative assessment cues and or medical diagnoses supported by evidence-based citations.
5.32 pts
Acceptable
Identifies 2 imperative assessment cues and or medical diagnosis supported by evidence-based citations.
4.2 pts
Needs Improvement
Identifies 1 imperative assessment cues and or medical diagnosis, vaguely supported by evidence-based citation.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Unable to identify any imperative assessments parameters relevant to medical diagnosis and without supported evidence-based citation.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterpreting diagnostic criteria & diagnostic tests and procedures
Clinical reasoning and analysis of cues
4 pts
Proficient
Clearly and accurately describes the client’s diagnostic criteria which clearly supports the chief complaints and presenting signs/symptoms.
3.04 pts
Acceptable
Adequately describes the client’s diagnostic criteria which adequately supports the identified chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms
2.4 pts
Needs Improvement
Vaguely describes the client’s diagnostic criteria which vaguely supports the identified chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Lack descriiption of the client’s diagnostic criteria that does not support the identified chief complaint and presenting signs/symptoms
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePast medical & surgical history, pathophysiology
Clinical judgment and recognizing cues
8 pts
Proficient
Past medical/surgical history detailed with full explanation of pathophysiology for admitting diagnosis and for each diagnosis & accurate detail with specific detail related to the client’s history and symptoms and supported by evidence-based citations.
6.08 pts
Acceptable
Past medical/surgical history given with partial explanation of identified admitting diagnosis and preexisting medical diagnoses, intermittent details related to the client’s history and symptoms, or not completely supported by evidence-based citations.
4.8 pts
Needs Improvement
Past medical/surgical history given with minimal explanation of identified admitting diagnosis and preexisting medical diagnoses; few to no details related to the client’s history and symptoms; or not supported by evidence-based citations.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No past medical/surgical history given or given without explanation; no admitting diagnosis and or pre-existing medical diagnosis identified or explanations inaccurate and not related to the client’s history and symptoms without evidence.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSocioeconomic/psychosocial assessment
The impact of socioeconomic and cultural background
7 pts
Proficient
Describes socioeconomic and cultural background in complete detail with references; identified 3 or more psychosocial concerns.
5.32 pts
Acceptable
Describes socioeconomic and cultural background with limited detail without references; identified 1-2 psychosocial concern.
4.2 pts
Needs Improvement
Describes socioeconomic and cultural background in vague detail without references; identified 1 psychosocial concern.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Describes socioeconomic and cultural background with no detail without references; identified no psychosocial concerns.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterprofessional consults & discharge referrals
Generating outcome data for plans
4 pts
Proficient
Lists 2-3 appropriate collaborative issues/concerns; rationale demonstrated satisfactory understanding of consults and interventions.
3.04 pts
Acceptable
Lists 1-2 appropriate collaborative issue/concern Rationale and demonstrated limited understanding of consults and interventions.
2.4 pts
Needs Improvement
Lists 1 appropriate collaborative issue/concern Rationale and demonstrated vague understanding of consults and interventions.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Lists inappropriate collaborative issues/concerns; rationale demonstrated unsatisfactory understanding of consults and intervention
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRisk assessment
Interpreting risk data analyses of cues
3 pts
Proficient
The goal clearly supports the nursing diagnosis and plan of care. The goals are specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and timed. Evaluates effectiveness of interventions and measures goal completion. Modifies, revises and recommends alternative interventions.
2.28 pts
Acceptable
The goal somewhat supports the nursing diagnosis and plan of care. The goals are somewhat measurable and realistic, and timed. Evaluates effectiveness of interventions and measures goal completion. Modifies, revises and recommends alternative interventions.
1.8 pts
Needs Improvement
The goals are inconsistent with the nursing diagnosis and plan of care. The goals are vaguely realistic, measure and timed. Evaluates effectiveness of interventions and measures goal completion. Modifies, revises and recommends alternative intervention.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The goals lack support and nonspecific from gathered data, Outcome criteria are not specific, realistic, measurable, attainable, nor timed. Does not evaluates effectiveness of interventions and measures goal completion. Modifies, revises and recommends alternative intervention.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMultidisciplinary Client Outcome & Discharge Planning
Analysis of teamwork and collaborative cues; analysis of collaboration with discharge planning
4 pts
Proficient
Clearly and accurately describes concerns related to multidisciplinary discharge planning.
3.04 pts
Acceptable
Adequately describes concerns related to multidisciplinary discharge planning.
2.4 pts
Needs Improvement
Vaguely describes concerns related to multidisciplinary discharge planning.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Fails to describe concerns related to multidisciplinary discharge planning.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeaching assessment & client education
Responding and implementation; responding to identified client educational needs.
7 pts
Proficient
Clearly and accurately identifies areas of instructional needs, learning preference, and learning barriers. Provided clear and concise client education that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities.
5.32 pts
Acceptable
Adequately identifies areas of instructional needs, learning preference and learning barriers. Provided some and adequate client education that aids in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities.
4.2 pts
Needs Improvement
Vaguely identifies areas of instructional needs, learning preference and learning barriers. Provided minimal and vague client education that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Fails to identify areas of instructional needs, learning preference and learning barriers. Did not provide client education that will aid in health promotion, health maintenance and self-care activities.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePertinent lab test & abnormal involuntary movement
Interpreting data for analyses of cues
4 pts
Proficient
Clearly and accurately identifies pertinent laboratory tests with abnormal values and identifying trends related to a client’s disease process
3.04 pts
Acceptable
Adequately identifies pertinent laboratory tests with abnormal values and identifying trends related to the client’s disease process.
2.4 pts
Needs Improvement
Vaguely identifies pertinent laboratory tests with abnormal values and identifying trends related to the client’s disease process.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Fails to identify pertinent laboratory tests with abnormal values and identifying trends related to the client’s disease process.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing clinical judgments
Interpreting data for prioritizing hypotheses; this criterion is linked to a clinical outcome: nursing clinical judgment.
7 pts
Proficient
The 4 nursing clinical judgements are accurate and prioritized with clear etiology and data to support rationale. The clinical decision is consistent and presents correlation from the assessment data based on Maslow’s Hierarchy and Mental Status Examination.
5.32 pts
Acceptable
The 4 nursing clinical Judgments are adequate and prioritized with sufficient etiology and data to support rational. The nursing clinical decision is adequate and presents correlation from assessment data based on Maslow’s Hierarchy and Mental Status Examination.
4.2 pts
Needs Improvement
The 4 clinical judgments are vague and not prioritized with vague etiology and unclear correlation from the assessment data that may or may not be classified based on Maslow’s Hierarchy and Mental Status Examination.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No clinical judgment is listed and or are based on Maslow’s Hierarchy and Mental Status Examination.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing clinical goals
Evaluation of nursing clinical judgment; clinical thinking + clinical reasoning = clinical judgment
4 pts
Proficient
Clearly and accurately establishes client’s outcome criteria and can be achieved with nursing assistance. The goal clearly supports the clinical decisions and plan of care. The goals are easily measurable and realistic.
3.04 pts
Acceptable
Adequately establishes client’s outcome criteria and can be achieved with nursing assistance. The goal somewhat supports the nursing diagnosis and plan of care. The goals are somewhat measurable and realistic.
2.4 pts
Needs Improvement
Vaguely establishes client’s outcome criteria and may or may not be achieved with nursing assistance. The goals are inconsistent with the nursing diagnosis and plan of care. The goals are vaguely realistic and measurable.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Fails to establish client’s outcome criteria that cannot be met by nursing assistance. The goals lack support and nonspecific from gathered data, Outcome criteria are not realistic and not measurable.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNursing interventions criteria & rationale
Interpret planning to generate solutions
8 pts
Proficient
Clearly and accurately Identifies independent nursing interventions criteria with teaching supported by scientific rationale and evidence-based practice. Interventions are always individualized, prioritized, organized, specific and realistic. Nursing actions are always aimed at the client’s goals and directed at the stated health deviation based on nursing assessment and Erickson’s stages of development.
6.08 pts
Acceptable
Adequately Identifies nursing interventions with adequate teaching. Scientific rationale is adequately supported by evidence-based practice. Interventions are adequate, individualized, organized, specific and realistic. Interventions can be implemented adequately that is focused on client’s goal and health deviation based on nursing assessment and Erickson’s stages of development.
4.8 pts
Needs Improvement
Vaguely Identifies nursing interventions with unclear teaching. Scientific rationale is vaguely relevant & not supported by evidence-based practice. Interventions are inconsistent, non-specific, disorganized, and not adequately focused on the client’s goal. Interventions are difficult to implement and has weak relationship to nursing diagnosis based on nursing assessment and Erickson’s stages of development.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Fails to identify interventions and teaching. Lack Scientific rationale and is not supported by evidence-based practice. Interventions are non-specific, inappropriate, unrealistic, un-measurable and do not relate to nursing diagnosis. Intervention does do not focus on client goals and/or the stated health deviation based on nursing assessment and Erickson’s stages of development.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation
8 pts
Proficient
Skillfully and independently identifies criteria for evaluation. Evaluates effectiveness of interventions and measure’s goal completion. Modifies, revises, and recommends alternative intervention.
6.08 pts
Acceptable
Adequately identifies criteria for evaluation. Adequately determines effectiveness of nursing interventions and measure’s goal completion with appropriate modification and revisions to the treatment plan.
4.8 pts
Needs Improvement
Difficulty utilizing criteria for evaluation. Difficulty determining effectiveness of interventions and goal completion. Evaluation vaguely supports if goal is met or not met with inaccurate revisions to the treatment plan.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Does not support nor utilize criteria for evaluation. Does not determine effectiveness of interventions and goal completion. There is a lack of alternative interventions to the treatment plan.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedications
8 pts
Proficient
Clearly and accurately identifies all components of the medication list, including mechanism of action, purpose, range, side effects, interactions, levels, and nursing considerations relevant to the client.
6.08 pts
Acceptable
Adequately identifies components of the medication list. Adequate descriiption of mechanism of action, purpose, range, side effects, interactions, levels, and nursing considerations relevant to the client.
4.8 pts
Needs Improvement
Vaguely identifies components of the medication list. Lack descriiption of mechanism of action, purpose, range side effects, interactions, levels, and nursing considerations relevant to the client.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Fails to identify components of the medication list. Failed to include mechanism of action, purpose, range side effects, interactions, levels, and nursing considerations relevant to the client.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGeneral Organization
4 pts
Proficient
Accurate APA format, appropriate citations, and references, No spelling or grammar errors.
3.04 pts
Acceptable
Adequate APA format. Minimal citations and references are appropriate. Few spellings or grammar errors.
2.4 pts
Needs Improvement
Numerous APA format errors, Inaccurate citations, and references. Few spelling and grammar errors.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Fails to utilize APA format. No citations or references included numerous spelling and grammar errors.
4 pts

n

Need Writing Help? Our writing specialists are here 24/7, every day of the year, ready to support you! Instantly chat with an online tutor below or click here to submit your paper instructions to the writing team.

More than just an assignment.

GET THE GRADES YOU DESERVE | A OR A- GUARANTEED
NO MORE SLEEPLESS NIGHTS DOING RESEARCH
NO MORE LATE POINTS DEDUCTIONS 
GET A QUALITY PAPER SENT TO YOUR EMAIL
GET GOOD GRADES ON YOUR ASSIGNMENTS
Explore Now →

Who is this homework service for?

* If you are having a really hard class and want to get through it, then this is for you.

* If you have a medical emergency or someone close to you has a medical emergency and you don’t think you’ll be able to turn your assignment on time, this is definitely a service you could use.

* You can use us if you are having a tough Professor who won’t give you the grades you deserve.

* If you have a tight work schedule and you are getting points deducted for not submitting assignments on time.

* English might not be your first language and you feel like you are being left behind in class because of it.

* If you have a large project coming up and don’t think you have enough time to get it done well, definitely reach out to us.

TALK TO SUPPORT
{

Super stoked you are checking us out! We would like to help you with your assignment. We just need a few things from you:

* The full assignment instructions as they appear on your school account.

* If a Rubric is present, make sure to attach it.

* Any relevant weekly readings or learning resources.

* Include any special announcements or emails you might have gotten from your Professor regarding your assignment.

* Any templates or additional files required to complete the assignment.

If your assignment is somewhat complex and you need to explain it, please don’t hesitate to reach out to me via live chat. 

 

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How soon can I get my paper done?

It depends with your deadline. If you need your paper completed in 3 hours, we will deliver it in that time. All you need to do is indicate your deadline in our custom order page here. Alternatively, if you are sending us your instructions via email, please be sure to indicate your deadline.

Will it be completely original? I don't want to be caught in a case of Academic Integrity Violation.

We are as paranoid as you are. Maybe even more! And we understand that the greatest sin you can commit in your academic journey is plagiarizing your academic work. To that end, we have made sure that we check and double-check our papers using high quality plagiarism detection tools such as SafeAssign and Turnitin before submitting the paper to you.

Who is my writer? Is he/she a native English Speaker?

All our writers are native English Speakers. That is not to say that ESL writers are not good, we just prefer hiring native writers because we want the very best people working on your paper. This might mean paying a little bit more for your paper as opposed to when you pay a foreign company whose writers are non-native English Speakers.

What if I need revisions? Will your charge additional for this?

Of course not! If you do happen to require a revision on your paper, our team will handle it for you free of charge. Matter of fact, we won’t rest till you are happy with your paper. So, ask for as many revisions as you need, it’s completely FREE!

Will you give me my money back if I don't like my paper?

We have very few instances where we delivered a paper that a client didn’t fall in love with. But if it so happens that you don’t like your paper for any reason whatsoever, we’ll refund your money back no questions asked.

I have more assignments after this, can you help me with those too?

Of course! And what’s even better is that we can reserve a writer permanently to work on your entire class. This comes in handy for projects which build up on each other and where you need just one writer, one writing style.

I got my order information wrong, can I change that?

Yes you can. Just reach out to our support team via email (support@essaynook.com) or live chat here and they’ll help you change the instructions.

Can I place an order via email instead of going through the order page?

Yes you can. Email Anna at anna@essaynook.com, she’s in charge of our sales team. Alternatively, you can talk to our Live Chat team here and request to speak to Anna.

Trusted by Thousands of Students

Delivering quality assignments since 2007

%d bloggers like this: